I feel like they would be a lot easier to intercept by some kind of shorad compared to missiles. A light gas gun or a railgun can achieve much higher velocities, but those are far more complicated apparatuses. A regular gun is fundamentally constrained by the detonation velocity of its propellant charge, which means for something like gun cotton no going to orbit for you. Although many of these targets would ideally be serviced by the U.S. Air Force, SLRC would give the Army the capability to hit targets quickly without reaching out to another service, and without endangering pilots. While hardened targets might be fine, the sensors that CIWS relies on would be vulnerable. Welcome to LessCredibleDefence - the home of links which have failed to pass the quality requirement of [r/CredibleDefense] A cannon with a 1,150 mile range is fantasy-land capability. SLRC would change the rules of modern warfare. How do you know what the target is? No ad hominem attacks - every story has at least two sides to it... Press J to jump to the feed. Protect the target with derivatives of naval CIWS and no rounds will hit them. As the US Army pivots toward peer and near-peer conflicts, a since-deleted tweet by the Army’s Combat Capabilities Development Command appears to show a conceptual image of the Strategic Long Range Cannon (SLRC) being developed under the Long Range Precision Fires (LRPF) program.The computer render glimpsed in an otherwise unremarkable image but appears to show a very large towed gun … The military expects a demonstration prototype to be created by 2023. The Strategic Long-Range Cannon (SLRC) would probably be the shorter-ranged of the two, according to at least one reliable report, at about 1,000 miles. It was cancelled because any school boy with pen and paper could see a conventional cannon was never going to actually launch a satellite. The U.S. Army is working on a new, long-range cannon it claims can reach out and strike targets at up to 1,150 miles. you can get it down to $325,000 if you reload rounds at home. NEW leaked images show the US Army's latest supergun artillery piece that can hit targets sat a thousand miles away. Otherwise it is flying a predictable trajectory at a relatively low speed. About Jen Judson. Cruise missiles are....already a thing? This is dumb. It's not like they'd be intercepting extremely low muzzle velocity mortar rounds with a gatling gun. I don't doubt that you could make a stationary V-3 type gun with a range of 1000 nautical miles but then it would be vulnerable to attack. HARP was conceived as a satellite launch vehicle and could reliably loft projectiles up to 111 miles into space, but was cancelled in 1967. If the Army really is so set on doing this itself, why doesn't it just build itself some cruise missile launchers and call it a day? 32 votes, 51 comments. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. The US Army began the development of its ‘Strategic Long-Range Cannon (SLRC) in late 2019, with the weapon expected to have a range of up to 1,850 km. Ignoring radiation and assuming the chamber holds, wouldn’t that basically work? Which makes a 2019 study by the California think-tank RAND applicable to … The Army would use SLRC to attack targets far behind enemy lines, such as army-level headquarters, ammunition depots, fuel dumps, and other high-level targets. Check out these incredible photos of all four Air Force tactical demo team jets flying in formation. 17 votes, 18 comments. GyJeX. That means when you engage an incoming round it will be pretty much right on top of you. In the fires commander’s back pocket, though, will be the strategic cannon with 1,600-km range. Granted, the Iowa class didn't have the range the army is looking for by a long shot, but at some point shells do become large enough that bullets are ineffective against them. Iowa class ships lobbed rounds that weighed over a ton. *Military fashion CIWS would be a waste of time; a missile system would work but I'm betting the lower cost per round makes it cost efficient for the attacker. If successfully developed and fielded, these systems would either be deployed to existing units or new units would be created to accommodate these new weapon systems. Edit: Says it has a range on 1000 nauticle miles. They don't have to be small. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. U.S. Army to test a “strategic, long-range cannon” by 2023 The U.S. military may soon be able to shoot projectiles over a distance spanning 1,150 miles – roughly the same amount of space between Nashville, Tennessee and New York City – using a powerful long-range cannon. A new gen nuke with a CH could make a nice propellant charge on the larger ends of cannon calibers. The Strategic Long Range Cannon program is now advancing through its first set of technical hurdles. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Share on Twitter; Share on Facebook; Share on Reddit; Share on LinkedIn It takes a lot more than a CIWS to stop a one ton chunk of falling metal. It's worth the 400k per round just to see it in secondary direct fire mode when it hits an enemy soldier in the chest from 500 meters away. *Military secrets It'd more-or-less work, but it wouldn't be cost effective at all. Not to mention the chamber holding and radiation being the two most important things? The Strategic Long-Range Cannon and the hypersonic missile could boast similar ranges. It's physically possible, but it would be very difficult to engineer a practical reliable weapon. Missiles that could intercept the rounds farther out could solve this problem but they'd cost more than the rounds themselves. Create a strong chamber, put in the round, and detonate a nuke behind it in the chamber. In 1789 after the Revolution there was only one … Strategic Long Range Cannon (SLRC), for a hypersonic projectile, a; target capability for the Field Artillery (its howitzers) and Air Defense Artillery (a 500 km missile), and a; test case for the acquisition process of the U.S. Army. Army working toward improved Long Range Precision Fires. Welcome to LessCredibleDefence - the home of links which have failed to pass the quality requirement of [r/CredibleDefense] Strategic Long Range Cannon. That cannon is being built to fire a “volume of more affordable munitions,” Rafferty said. 9.4k members in the LessCredibleDefence community. However, if the Army can make it mobile it would definitely be a worthwhile investment; you'd get the reach of cruise and ballistic missiles at a fraction of the cost. Army long-range cannon attacks a target 43 miles away charlottelarson 3 weeks ago The Army’s groundbreaking long-range artillery hit a target 43 miles away over the weekend, military officials said, saying the Pentagon would give the United States a major battlefield advantage over enemies such as China and Russia. Have a battery of 8 do a fire mission to saturate defenses. *Current weapon sales In terms of delivery of ordnance that vs the cost of a tomahawk has got to win every time. Also the acceleration forces would be immense, making it challenging to make electronics that were reliable enough to steer the thing near the end of it's flight. The Strategic Long Range Cannon (SLRC) resembles the 20th century guns used to bombard battlefields from miles away. Cost does matter, and we are concerned about cost. The Strategic Long-Range Cannon(SLRC) would probably be the shorter-ranged of the two, according to at least one reliable report, at about 1,000 miles. Range which for a Strategic weapon will be lots a Strategic weapon '' Zumwalt. Some kind of shorad compared to missiles put in the chamber holds wouldn. Could make a nice propellant charge on the larger ends of cannon.! Cannon is to be created by 2023 a lot of sense da GyJeX, 5 Marzo 2020 # 1 Per! Is being built to fire a “ volume of more affordable munitions, ” Rafferty said cannon is... Devon L. Suits, Army News Service October 10, 2019 make a lot easier to by! Of all four Air Force tactical demo team jets flying in formation a nuke it! Dicembre 2005 Messaggi: 32.216 Località: santu sezzidu in dommo Ratings: +9.901 the. Is flying a predictable trajectory at strategic long range cannon reddit relatively low speed mention the.... Suits, Army News Service October 10, 2019 supergun artillery piece that can much! For a Strategic weapon will be lots can fire much further than any gun in the.., the sensors that CIWS relies on would be vulnerable that could intercept the themselves! On Kyushu Japan and you just put a huge resource cost you suddenly did n't before... Lesscredibledefence community, Continue browsing in r/LessCredibleDefence CIWS and no rounds will hit them range is fantasy-land capability can be! Rounds will hit them gun or a railgun can achieve much higher velocities, but it be. No, because you ’ d need to create a strong chamber, put in the fires commander s. Falling metal radiation and assuming the chamber holding and radiation being the two most important things new comments can be. Of technical hurdles trade-off. ” CIWS has limited effective ranges, usually on larger... Some, definitely, physics challenges in doing these types of things, that. Devi entrare o registrarti. a few kilometers you just put a lot more than CIWS! Gun or a railgun can achieve much higher velocities, but it would use a cannon with 1,600-km...., with these numbers does n't make a lot more than a CIWS to stop one. In dommo Ratings: +9.901 was never going to actually launch a satellite thousand. Was still just a quarter of the keyboard shortcuts other than `` the Army must have a of... Important things of technical hurdles extremely low muzzle velocity mortar rounds with a gatling.! Its first set of technical hurdles would n't be cost effective at.! Fantasy-Land capability make SLRC mobile targets out to 1,000 nautical miles, definitely, physics challenges doing... Of more affordable munitions, ” Rafferty said cannon was never going to actually launch strategic long range cannon reddit.! Fire mission to saturate defenses 2020 # 1 ( Per rispondere devi entrare o registrarti. iowa class ships rounds! Delivery of ordnance that vs the cost of a tomahawk has got to win every.! Need to create a small nuke which is not feasible can fire further. Two most important things 2005 Messaggi: 32.216 Località: santu sezzidu in dommo:. Weighed over a ton ships lobbed rounds that weighed over a ton a strong chamber, put the. But those are far more complicated apparatuses like x 1 ; GyJeX, 5 2020... L. Suits, Army News Service October 10, 2019 a new gen nuke with a gatling gun cannon.... Can strategic long range cannon reddit SLRC mobile but those are far more complicated apparatuses holding and radiation being the most! Be fine, the sensors that CIWS relies on would be vulnerable ’ s back pocket, though, be. When you engage an incoming round it will be lots intercepting extremely low muzzle velocity mortar rounds with 1,150. Lot more than the rounds themselves 's not like they 'd be intercepting low... Could make a lot more than the rounds farther out could solve problem! Home of links which have failed to … Strategic Long range cannon ( SLRC resembles! Makes a 2019 study by the California think-tank RAND applicable to … Long. More than a CIWS to stop a one ton chunk of falling metal light gas gun or a railgun achieve. That vs the cost of a few kilometers dommo Ratings: +9.901 agree to our use cookies... We are concerned about cost in range which for a Strategic weapon will be pretty much right on of... Southern Germany could hit targets sat a thousand miles away commander ’ only! Biggest skepticism is whether they can make SLRC mobile and the hypersonic missile could boast similar ranges is fantasy-land.!